|
|||
CACTUS 1 & 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In a HLW repository, the
presence of canisters in the storage galleries, as a thermal source, will
provoke an increase of the temperature in the surrounding host rock. This
temperature variation will directly affect the hydro-mechanical properties
of this rock. To study the long-term safety of a storage site, it is necessary
to assess the influence of this thermal loading, on the host rock characteristics.
Since Boom Clay is a potential host formation for HLW storage, two instrumented
demonstration tests have been elaborated in the HADES URL. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Objective of the experiment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aim of the experiment
is to study the THM behaviour of the Boom Clay formation around a vertical
lineic thermal source representing a stacking of HLW canisters. The experimental
scale was chosen as close as possible to the real scale. Globally, it
was necessary to measure the THM response of the clay host rock to this
thermal loading. A derivated objective was to measure the amplitude of
expected independent or coupled processes in order to identify a bottom
line of the observed phenomena and to propose a relevant conceptual model
for the near-field behaviour. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description of the experiment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Protocol/explanation : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The external diameter of
the thermal probes is equal to 30 cm (to be compared to the 43 cm diameter
of the COGEMA canisters) and the length of the heated part is 2 metres.
The "CACTUS" programme is composed of two in situ tests. The
first test (CACTUS 1) served as preliminary approach. Each test is composed,
in addition to a thermal probe placed in a large diameter central borehole,
of a peripheral instrumentation located in six small diameter boreholes.
The peripheral instrumentation has been installed first, in order to record
stabilized the hydro-mechanical parameters prior to the drilling of the
central borehole. The physionomy of the instrumentation is identical for
both tests. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Instrumentation : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Status/timing/planning : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| These tests and their interpretation has been completed in the frame of the 4th EC framework programme. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CACTUS 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CACTUS 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Associated works : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results of the experiment : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before the excavation, it seems that the mechanical influence zone of the access gallery on the clay host rock has an extension that is larger than seven times its radius. During the excavation of the first central borehole, that lasted two days, a brutal response is observed: a drop of the interstitial pressure around the excavation, a drop of radial stress and an increase of the orthoradial stress. An increase of the water content is observed, while the density does not vary a lot. During the excavation of the second central borehole (CACTUS 2), an increase of the radial and orthoradial stresses are first observed during the drilling prior a decrease in the following days. In both cases, the deviatoric stress, defined by the difference between radial and orthoradial stresses has increased during the excavation. According to analytical calculations, the deviatoric stress is proportional to the excavation radius, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the borehole axis. After the excavation, the interstitial pressures and the total stress components tend to their original values. In CACTUS 2, the equilibrium of the interstitial pressures was not reached yet when the heating phase was started. A re-consolidation of the clay host rock is observed after the excavation. During the heating phase, the temperature measurements are coherent.
The temperature field has an axisymetric configuration around the probe.
The temperature rapidly decreases with the distance from the heat source.
After one year of heating, the temperature increase is equal to 130-140°C
on the probe, while it does not go beyond 20°C at a distance of
1.5m. The thermal analysis is made independently from the hydro-mechanical
analysis, for the principal heat transfer process is conduction. The
experimental measurements are successfully modelled by a numerical simulation
with the following parameters: Three phases are observed for the THM parameters evolution in a given point of the host rock: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The hydro-mechanical response vary according to these phase: At the initial phase, the response is limited. We note a decrease of the orthoradial stress, an increase of the radial stress and of the interstitial pressures. At the transient phase both radial and orthoradial stresses increase, as well as the interstitial pressures. A decrease of the water content is observed. The thermal dilation of the hot zone is hampered by the surrounding clay massif producing compressions in this zone. The thermal dilation coefficient of water is much higher than the constitutive minerals of Boom Clay. In an undrained situation, the interstitial water is overpressurized. A hydraulic gradient appears between the warm and cold zones leading to the dissipation of the overpressures. At the near equilibrium phase, there is almost no variation of the total stress components. The interstitial pressure decrease and stabilize. The compressions appeared during the transient phase are maintained, even after the dissipation of the interstitial overpressures. Considering the water content and the strain, they are evolving towards the original state. The strain evolution is elapsed over a long period of time, which might indicate a creep due to the visco-platic properties of Boom Clay. During the cooling phase, the THM parameters inversely evolve in comparison with the heating phase, on a very similar way. This observation tends to indicate that an important part of the observed variations are reversible.. Nevertheless, it is essential to identify the irreversibilities that subsist., i.e.: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The most interesting observation concerns the water content variation: the irreversibilities established during the first heating phase do not appear during the next cycle of similar amplitude. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conclusions : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All the measurements could be used for the prediction of the hydro-mechanical response of a saturated clay host rock under the effect of a thermal loading. The results of the two tests coincide. The observed THM couplings are different in nature: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bibliography : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||