HOME  
 

PRETEL
 
EXPERIMENT'S NAME
PRE-Tensioned Lining
LAST MODIFIED
19/01/2004
EXPERIMENT'S ACRONYM
PRETEL
TYPE OF TEST
Construction technique

PERSON RESPONSIBLE
Name : Wim Bastiaens
Email : wbastiae@sckcen.be

COLLABORATIONS
SMET Boring

FINANCING ORGANISM(S)
SCK•CEN, SMET Boring, IWT

GLOBAL BUDGET (k€)
~250

 
Background
Several disposal concepts involve disposal galleries with a diameter about 2 metre. However, smaller diameter disposal galleries can be considered also and have some advantages:
  • smaller volume to be excavated/backfilled;
  • smaller disturbance of the host rock.

The most common method to place lining behind a micro-tunnel machine is pipe-jacking. This method consists in pushing the lining elements with hydraulic jacks, one after another, from the main gallery. For our purpose, tunnelling in clays at more than 200 metres depth, this method has a limited applicability: the length of the micro-galleries should be limited to 30 metres; otherwise the friction between the lining and the host rock would become too high.

The PRETEL project deals with the development of a new method to install the lining behind a micro-tunnel machine, avoiding the friction between the lining and the massif.

 
Objective of the experiment
The aim of the experiment is to design and test such a new lining system allowing micro-tunnelling in cohesive soils like Boom Clay.
 
Specific explanations (if relevant):
The PRETEL experiment can be divided in two phases:
1) design and testing of the PRETEL lining system (SCK•CEN R&D project);
2) (re-)design of the lining system and testing of a prototype including a micro-tunnel machine (IWT co-sponsored project in cooperation with SMET Boring).
 
Description of the experiment
 
Phase 1: design and testing of the PRETEL lining system.

Design:


Figure 1: Expansion principle of the PRETEL lining.


Figure 2: Lay-out of the in situ test.

 
Protocol/explanation :
During this phase, the PRETEL lining was designed, tested on-surface, adapted and tested in situ. It was patented by SCKCEN (n° 95201867.9). The lining consists of expanded tube elements sectioned longitudinally; the external diameter is 63 cm. They ensure the stability of the micro-tunnel during excavation. This is realised, using steel lining tube segments sectioned in the length and bent with an overlapping, so that the outer diameter of the plied tube is smaller than the inner diameter of the lining already in place. This allows the passage of the elements to be installed to the front of the micro-tunnel (figure 1). After the complete excavation of the micro-tunnel, the final lining is placed inside the existing one to ensure long term stability.The in situ test was installed at the western sidewall (ring 21) of the URL in order to test the stability of such a lining element. The PRETEL lining element was fixed (punctual welds) to a cutting head (length: 75 cm; diameter: 635/675 mm) which was pushed in a borehole by means of a hydraulic jack. Once in place, the element was de-welded and expanded using a custom designed system with hydraulic jacks (figure 2).
 
Instrumentation :
Measurements of the diameter variations are performed in four directions. The vertical movement of the PRETEL tube is also monitored, as is the rotational movement at the seam of the PRETEL tube (figure 3).

Figure 3: Instrumentation lay-out of the in situ test.
 
Phase II: (re-)design of the lining system and testing of a prototype including a micro-tunnel machine (CCRS: Clay and Cohesive soil Retievable Shield).
 
Design:
 
Figure 4: Re-designed lining (CCRS). Left: pre-design (illustration by SMET Tunnelling); right: on-surface test.
 
Protocol/explanation :
This phase is carried out in cooperation with SMET Boring and is co-sponsored by IWT. A micro-tunneller was being designed in combination with the PRETEL lining system as designed during phase I. However, during the construction of the connecting gallery (2001-2002), useful experience was gathered and important changes were made to the design of the lining system. A new concept (using segmental, concrete lining) has been designed to overcome the difficulties of transporting and placing the lining segments in small tunnels. However, the main principle remains unchanged: a lining which can be transported as a whole through the already placed part of the tunnel and which can than be expanded/installed easily behind a micro-tunneller. This system consists of a lorry on which all segments (are connected to each other by means of hinges) are loaded and transported (figure 4). In “loaded” condition, the lorry can pass trough the already constructed part of the tunnel. The design is made in a way that the ducts and cables necessary for the tunnelling machine at the front can remain in place. Once the lorry is positioned just behind the tunnelling shield, the system ensures the placement of the lining using cables and hydraulic jacks. The lorry and hinges can be reused afterwards for a next lining section. The prototype was patented (tunneller: n° EP 1 094 198 A2, lining system: application in progress).
 
Instrumentation :
The lining system has only been tested on-surface; no instrumentation was used.
 
Status/timing/planning :
  • 1994: Start of the R&D project with a feasibility study.
  • 1995: European patent application (n° 95201867.9)
  • 1996: Installation of the PRETEL lining element in HADES
  • 1997: Start of the CCRS-project (co-sponsored by IWT) in collaboration with SMET Boring.
  • 2003: On-surface tests with the re-designed lining.
  • 2004: Testing of a prototype combining a micro-tunnel machine in combination with the redesigned lining system in a clay quarry.
 
Results of the experiment :
  • Phase 1: In situ testing of the PRETEL lining has demonstrated that it can assure the short term stability of a tunnel during excavation phase (the installed test tube is stable up until now). The evolution of the diameters, position and rotational movement of the tube was studied. For example, figure 5 shows the variation of the in situ test tube during the first 300 days following installation. Initially, the tube was slightly oval (D1 is the vertical diameter, see figure 3). After about 40 days, a nearly circular shape is observed: contact between the converging clay and the entire tube circumference exists. Later on (~100 days), the pressure continues to build up and the tube ovalises again: due to stress redistribution around the main gallery (URL), the vertical stress on the tube is larger than the horizontal one.


    Figure 5: Diameter variation of the PRETEL in situ test tube.

  • Phase 2: A surface-test examining the feasibility of this technique was performed successfully (figure 4). The feasibility of an excavation combined with the re-designed lining system (CCRS) will be demonstrated in the future by construction of a prototype and testing it in a quarry.
 
Conclusions :

The results of the project up to now suggest that micro-tunnelling using another technique than pipe jacking will be feasible. A first design proved to be satisfactory at that time but lessons learned during the construction of the connecting gallery led to an important re-design of the lining system. On-surface tests with the re-designed lining are promising and a prototype (combining excavation and lining) will be built and tested in the future.

Some HLW disposal concepts include micro-tunnels. However, micro-tunnelling using the pipe jacking technique is not feasible in plastic clays at large depths (>200m) due to the high amount of friction between the pipes and the host rock. A new technique for the construction of small diameter galleries is being developed and shows promising results. Hence, it will probably become technically feasible to construct small diameter disposal galleries in a clay host rock at depths over 200m.

Supplementary (new) experiment(s) expected.
In situ demonstration of the re-designed lining system in combination with a micro-tunnelling machine.

 
Bibliography :
  • F. Bernier, P. Meynendonckx and M. Verboven, 1996, "The PRETEL Project, R&D Progress Report I", SCKCEN, R-3094.
  • F. Bernier, P. Meynendonckx and V. Labiouse, 1997, "The PRETEL Project, R&D Progress Report II", SCKCEN, R-3167.
  • European patent n° 95201867.9: Creusement de microtunnels (SCK).
  • European patent n° EP 1 094 198 A2 (SMET Boring).